Express your opinion about this website:
Traffic report about germanitlaw.com - here you can find answers to questions like these:
The most recent time we have spotted germanitlaw.com on Alexa rankings was on August 27, 2015 (3,196 days ago) and then the ranking was 950,023. And this is a bit worse position than average position for germanitlaw.com in Alexa.
Our system has never spotted germanitlaw.com in Quantcast ratings.
This fact suggests this domain potentially has low traffic from USA and Canada.
Website is hosted on IP 81.169.145.163.
The host name of this IP address is wa3.rzone.de.
There are 50 websites hosted on exact the same IP and 67 websites that are hosted on similar IP address.
Our database records shows that this website can be similar to: sandycandy.eu, dartnet.nl, cafesi.eu, grandale.net, clever-sparen-blog.de, work-and-travel-australien.com, hotelkreuzer-volkach.de, koyshunka.com, wigacon.de, kraemerplatz.com and maybe even more.
We've checked germanitlaw.com recently and it was online. The load time was 1.1197 seconds faster than average. The size of document was 40,211 bytes longer than usually. The website contained 257 links more than the average.
It seems that germanitlaw.com is optimised for mobile devices.
We did not encounter any safety threats while testing this website.
We did not find any data about germanitlaw.com being listed in the blacklists.
It seems that germanitlaw.com was never dropped before.
Click here to see the list of dropped domains
Our system found out that there could be 291 domains with the same beginning as germanitlaw.com
Our system found out that there could be 61 mistakes made in the typing process.
And here you'll find analysis of HTML code:
PROPERTY | VALUE |
---|---|
Keywords: | JBB, German Law, IT Law, Technology Law, Data Privacy Law, Data Security Law, Germany, Julian Hoeppner, Miriam Ballhausen, Dominik Kirschner, Lina Boecker, Carlo Piltz |
WEB address: | http://germanitlaw.com/ |
Summary: | Law blog by JBB's IT practice group on German IT law, technology law and data privacy law. |
<title> | JBB German Technology and Data Privacy Law Blog |
Hosting information: | Click here for more hosting information |
Size of HTML code: | +40,211 bytes compared to average |
Total number of links: | +257 links compared to average |
Load time: | -1.11970565 seconds compared to average |
META TAG PROPERTY | VALUE |
og:description | On 14th September, the German data protection authorities ("DPAs"), gathering in the so called "circle of Düsseldorf", issued a non-binding opinion (pdf, German) on the question of the lawfulness of consents under the looming General Data Protection Regulation ("GDPR"), which were obtained under the conditions of the current legal framework. Referring to recital 171 of the GDPR, the DPAs state that currently given consents remain valid "if the manner in which the consent has been given is in line with the conditions of" the GDPR. According to the DPAs, validly given consents under the current legal framework in general fulfill these requirements. The two important words here are: "in general". Because this means that there exist exceptions. The DPAs further state that information obligations in accordance with Art. 13 GDPR must not be fulfilled in this regard, since these obligations don't belong to the "conditions” referred to in recital 171. At the end of their statement, the DPAs |
og:site_name | German IT Law |
viewport | width=device-width |
twitter:site | @germanitlaw |
twitter:card | summary |
og:title | German IT Law |
twitter:domain | germanitlaw.com |
twitter:description | On 14th September, the German data protection authorities ("DPAs"), gathering in the so called "circle of Düsseldorf", issued a non-binding opinion (pdf, German) on the question of the lawfulness of consents under the looming General Data Protection Regulation ("GDPR"), which were obtained under the conditions of the current legal framework. Referring to recital 171 of the GDPR, the DPAs state that currently given consents remain valid "if the manner in which the consent has been given is in line with the conditions of" the GDPR. According to the DPAs, validly given consents under the current legal framework in general fulfill these requirements. The two important words here are: "in general". Because this means that there exist exceptions. The DPAs further state that information obligations in accordance with Art. 13 GDPR must not be fulfilled in this regard, since these obligations don't belong to the "conditions” referred to in recital 171. At the end of their statement, the DPAs |
twitter:title | German IT Law |
twitter:image | http://germanitlaw.com/wp-content/plugins/all-in-one-seo-pack/images/default-user-image.png |
og:url | http://germanitlaw.com/ |
generator | WordPress 4.5.4 |
og:image | http://germanitlaw.com/wp-content/plugins/all-in-one-seo-pack/images/default-user-image.png |
google-site-verification | aCU8_xY6ebe-kx0xK93eyKRItIkw9G6Frd3J3CA4kaQ |
Website: | germanitlaw.com |
---|---|
Most recent position: | 950,023 reached on August 27, 2015 (3,196 days ago) |
Times found in Alexa list: | 8 |
Average position: | 952,179 |
All time highest position: | 944,417 reached on August 19, 2015 (3,204 days ago) |
All time lowest position: | 957,239 reached on August 22, 2015 (3,201 days ago) |
This table shows websites that use 81.169.145.163 (wa3.rzone.de) for hosting:
Note: The matching part of IP address is marked with this style.
No data about germanitlaw.com being in Quantcast ratings...
There are 291 alternatives to germanitlaw.com
We believe that these mistakes can be made in the typing process of "germanitlaw.com":
No data about germanitlaw.com being in dropped domains database...